|
EDWARD E. WEIMAN joined White O'Connor
Fink & Brenner LLP in 2001, after several years specializing in trademark and
other intellectual property disputes both in federal court and before
the United States Patent and Trademark Office's Trademark Trial and
Appeal Board. Mr. Weiman became a partner in the firm in 2006,
continuing his representation of major film and television production
entities and other clients in copyright and idea submission, general
business, antitrust, and insurance bad faith litigation.
Mr. Weiman has been
named as one of Southern California’s “Super Lawyers” by Los
Angeles Magazine in both 2005 and 2007, and is a member of the
Intellectual Property & Entertainment Law Section of the Los Angeles
County Bar Association, and a member of the Forum on Communications
Law and Intellectual Property Law Section of the American Bar
Association. Mr. Weiman has provided numerous in-house lectures to
entertainment clients over the years on the subjects of copyright and
trademark law, idea submission claims and legal ethics, and is a
co-author of a casebook study guide on contract law, High Court
Case Summaries (Dana L. Blatt ed., 6th ed., West Group 2002).
Mr. Weiman received
his B.A. degree from the University of Pennsylvania in 1987. He
received his J.D. degree from the University of Southern California
Law School in 1997, where he was the Champion of the Hale Moot Court
Honors Program, a member of the National Moot Court Team, and a Topic
Editor on the Moot Court Executive Board. Mr. Weiman is a member of
the California state bar, and is admitted to practice before the
United States District Court for the Central District of California
and the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Appeals
Maureen Marder
v. Jennifer Lopez, Sony Music Entertainment, Inc. and Paramount
Pictures Corporation, 450 F.3d 445 (9th Cir. 2006). Representing
Paramount Pictures Corporation, successfully moved to dismiss a
copyright infringement and copyright co-ownership action concerning
the motion picture “Flashdance.” Affirmed.
Rex Reginald v.
New Line Cinema Corporation, United Talent Agency, Inc., and Robert
Shaye, Docket No. 04-55615 (Cal. App. 2004). Representing New
Line and Robert Shaye, secured the dismissal on summary judgment of an
idea submission action concerning the motion picture “Wedding
Crashers.” Affirmed.
Time Warner
Entertainment Company, L.P. v. Continental Casualty Company, 72
Fed. Appx. 586 (9th Cir. 2003). Representing TWEC, successfully moved
for summary judgment in an insurance bad faith action, resulting in
$2.7 million judgment against Continental Casualty for breach of duty
to defend Time Warner in litigation brought by Francis Ford Coppola.
Affirmed.
David H.
Verdiner v. Scottrade, Inc., Docket No. 06-56655 (9th Cir. 2006).
Representing Scottrade, successfully moved to dismiss this securities
class action alleging false advertising and unfair business practices
regarding the assessment of online broker fees. Pending.
Other Representative Cases
Troll Company
A/S v. DIC Entertainment Corporation, American Arbitration
Association and United States District Court (represented DIC in
four-month arbitration and concurrent federal litigation concerning
alleged breach of character license agreements, fraud, breach of
fiduciary duty, etc., regarding Classic Troll dolls).
Regina Kimbell
v. Home Box Office, Inc., Chris Rock, et al., United States
District Court (represented HBO and Chris Rock in copyright
infringement action concerning the documentary "Good Hair", successfully
defending against application for temporary restraining order and
motion for preliminary injunction).
Carlo Carlei v.
Gianni Nunnari, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court. Represented
Gianni Nunnari, the President of Hollywood Gang Productions, in an
idea submission action concerning the motion picture “300,” securing
the dismissal of numerous claims on summary judgment, including breach
of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and fraud.
Intertainer Inc.
v. Time Warner Inc., et al., United States District Court, Central
District of California. Represented Time Warner, Warner Bros.
Entertainment, Warner Home Video, and New Line Television in this
antitrust and misappropriation action alleging a conspiracy and
combination to restrain competition in the Internet video-on-demand
market, and an agreement to fix prices for the licensing of studio
product.
In Plain Sight
Media, Inc., et al. v. City of Los Angeles, et al., United States
District Court, Central District of California. Represented IPSM in
this First Amendment challenge to an ordinance restricting the
placement of supergraphic signs on the exterior of the historic
Hollywood Roosevelt Hotel, securing a preliminary injunction against
the enforcement of the ordinance at issue, which led to its repeal.
Marty Stouffer
Productions, LTD v. King World Direct, Inc., United States
District Court for the Central District of California. Represented
King World in a copyright infringement action arising out of the
alleged breach of a licensing agreement for the distribution of the
“Wild America” home video series.
Santa Fe
Entertainment Inc. v. Paramount Pictures Corporation, et al.,
United States District Court, Central District of California.
Represented Paramount Pictures in this copyright infringement action
concerning the motion picture “Clockstoppers.”
Time Warner
Entertainment Company, L.P. v. Continental Casualty Company,
United States District Court, Central District of California.
Represented TWEC in this insurance action, securing summary judgment
on a multi-million dollar claim for breach of duty to defend TWEC in
an action for copyright infringement brought against Warner Bros.
regarding the motion picture "Contact"
Publications
Michael J.
O’Connor, Edward E. Weiman, and Audrey J. Jing, New Appleman on
Insurance, Ch. 31, Media Liability Insurance,
Forthcoming 2010.
Edward E.. Weiman
and Kenneth D. Kronstadt, Anti-SLAPP Protection in the
Entertainment Context: The Legacy (If Any) Of Dyer v. Childress,
27-1 Communications Lawyer (April 2010).
Michael J.
O’Connor, Edward E. Weiman, and Audrey J. Jing, California
Insurance Law and Practice, Ch. 52, Media Liability Insurance
(Matthew Bender & Company, Inc. 2009).
Edward E. Weiman,
et al., High Court Case Summaries on Contracts (Dana
L. Blatt ed., 6th ed., West Group 2002).
Lectures
What To Expect
When You’re Accepting: Recent Developments In Copyright And Idea
Submission Law, MCLE Seminar (August 2009).
Faculty, American
Bar Association, Forum on Communications Law, 14th Annual Conference,
Training & Development Media Advocacy Workshop (February 2009).
Dude,
Where’s My Cut?: Case Studies in Idea Submission Law,
American Bar Association, Forum on Communications Law, 13th Annual
Conference, Training & Development Media Advocacy Workshop, MCLE
Seminar (February 2008).
Steal this
Program: Recent Developments in Copyright and Trademark Law,
Continuing Legal Education Seminar (Fall 2007).
Sqrat Fights and
Reality Bites: Recent Developments in Copyright and Idea Submission
Law, Continuing Legal Education Seminar (October 2006).
Barbarians at
the Gates: Recent Developments in Copyright and Idea Submission Law,
Continuing Legal Education Seminar (September 2006).
Trump Bashers
and Wedding Crashers: Recent Developments in Copyright and Idea
Submission Law, Continuing Legal Education Seminar (February
2006).
Surviving
America's Most Amazing and Extreme Legal Makeover: Copyright and Idea
Submission Claims Invade Reality Television, Continuing Legal
Education Seminar (October 2005).
The Whole
Enchilada: Wrench LLC v. Taco Bell Corp. and Idea Submission Claims,
Continuing Legal Education Seminar (May 2004).
Legal Ethics:
Relevant Issues and Developments, Continuing Legal Education
Seminar (July 2003).
|